On 19/04/16 18:40, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:09:52PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 19/04/16 12:59, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 01:42:55AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >>>> On 15/04/16 16:36, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>>>> We have a POWER8 FATE station now and I noticed that release 11 fails >>>>> horribly on POWER8. At Luca's suggestion I started looking into >>>>> backporting support and it turns out the patches apply cleanly. >>>>> So here it is... >>>> >>>> The first 4 can get in, the others are features. >>> >>> Anton is right that this is somewhat of a feature backport. Just the >>> first four patches only fix part of the problem, so I tend to think >>> that it is not worth the trouble. I'll just drop the set unless >>> somebody insists. >> >> Right now you get something that would fail completely at runtime >> because the naive assumption PPC == BE. >> >> 1-4 + 6 aren't features but fixes. > > 2 adds POWER8 support to the CPU detection routines. One could argue it > to be a feature addition. I'm not sure this is worth the trouble...
Then 3, 4 and 6 should be the bare minimum. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
