On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 11:00:33AM +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > --- > > @@ -4452,11 +4448,8 @@ check_code cc arm_neon.h "int16x8_t test = > > vdupq_n_s16(0)" && enable intrinsics_ > > > > check_ldflags -Wl,--as-needed > > > > -if check_func dlopen; then > > - ldl= > > -elif check_func dlopen -ldl; then > > - ldl=-ldl > > -fi > > +# On some systems dynamic loading requires no extra linker flags > > +check_lib libdl dlfcn.h dlopen || check_lib libdl dlfcn.h dlopen -ldl > > > > if ! disabled network; then > > check_func getaddrinfo $network_extralibs > > The change is ok, I'm just unsure whether the check_lib should be > closer to where the other check_lib checks are.
Moved it between the zlib and libm check. All of these tests could use a bit of reordering... Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
