Quoting Anton Khirnov (2017-02-08 11:51:00) > Nothing guarantees that the line is large enough for two blocks, so > current code may result in invalid memory access. This change makes the > function ~5% slower, but since this is a highly obscure filter that > nobody should use, its performance is not very important. > --- > libavfilter/x86/vf_interlace.asm | 23 ++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
ping -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
