On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Diego Biurrun wrote:
NASM is more actively maintained and permits generating dependency information
as a sideeffect of assembling, thus cutting build times in half.
---
Updated the documentation to reflect that nasm is now preferred over yasm.
.travis.yml | 4 ++--
configure | 14 +++++++-------
doc/optimization.txt | 8 ++++----
doc/platform.texi | 12 ++++++------
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Seems ok to me. Do I recall correctly that you had thought about letting
the user choose which one to prefer/use via a configure flag as well, but
chose not to do it since it would have ended up too messy?
// Martin
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
