On 06/03/2017 10:43, wm4 wrote: > Isn't OpenCL technically provided by the driver, which makes the > licensing questionable, but is usually not an issue because it's > considered a system-provided thing?
There are multiple OpenCL implementations, usually they are provided by the driver, platform-specific AND version specific. There is an [abstraction][1] provided by Khronos that distributions might or might not use instead of directly link a specific implementation directly, the [headers][2] are anyways always provided. We might want to support the extension if available I guess. [1]:https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-ICD-Loader [2]:https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-Headers lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
