ok, it seems that ./configure related deps change are missing.

as you did for overlay:

_filter_deps=

_filter_select=



On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Huang, Zhengxu <zhengxu.maxw...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 2017/8/1 3:22, Maxym Dmytrychenko wrote:
>
> LGTM, seems to be working just fine
>
>
> Performance will be significantly reduced
>
> if there are performance numbers showing this statement - would be good to
> share it.
>
> The performance comparison between the cascade mode and union mode is blew:
>
>
> As the Libav now only has scale_qsv /interlace_qsv two qsv filters and the
> deinterlace module still has some bug.
> So we use our common filter module to simulate. Though the code is
> different but the result is nearly the same(once we
> make the validation on our patches that 
> framerate/denoise/deinterlace/detail/scale
> filter module are independent).
>
> There are only three filters in the test case but the performance has
> significantly reduced. The more filters in the cascade system
> the more drop on the performance compared with the union mode.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> 
> <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 31/07/2017 03:27, Huang, Zhengxu wrote:
>
>
>  Looks good after a first read, I still need to try it.
>
> Thank you a lot :)
>
> lu
>
> _______________________________________________
> libav-devel mailing 
> listlibav-devel@libav.orghttps://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> libav-devel mailing 
> listlibav-devel@libav.orghttps://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to