On Wed,  4 Oct 2017 09:07:11 +0100
Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net> wrote:

> ---
>  libavcodec/h263dec.c       | 10 ++++++++++
>  libavcodec/h264dec.c       | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  libavcodec/hevcdec.c       | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  libavcodec/hwaccel.h       | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  libavcodec/mmaldec.c       |  7 +++++++
>  libavcodec/mpeg12dec.c     | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  libavcodec/mpeg4videodec.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  libavcodec/qsvdec.c        | 11 +++++++++++
>  libavcodec/qsvdec.h        |  2 ++
>  libavcodec/qsvdec_h2645.c  |  2 ++
>  libavcodec/qsvdec_other.c  |  3 +++
>  libavcodec/vc1dec.c        | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  libavcodec/vp8.c           |  7 +++++++
>  13 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

LGTM. The macros seem a bit messy on the first look, but I like that
the line noise/duplication is kept to a minimum.

I _think_ with this we could easily remove the get_format mess in the
decoders. See for example hevcdec.c/get_format(): we go through lots of
effort and ifdeffery to build the pix_fmts[] array, which seems dumb.
Just mentioning that in case someone complains that this patch adds
more ifdeffery.

Though I also wonder if we could merge the AVHWAccel entrypoints into
AVCodec and AVCodecHWConfig, which would require different definitions
again.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to