On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 04:58:29PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:38:05PM +0200, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> > > Le 30/03/2018 à 10:46, Diego Biurrun a écrit :
> > > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:36:05AM +0200, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> > > > > --- a/configure
> > > > > +++ b/configure
> > > > > @@ -4581,6 +4582,7 @@ check_lib ole32    "windows.h"            
> > > > > CoTaskMemFree        -lole32
> > > > >   check_lib shell32  "windows.h shellapi.h" CommandLineToArgvW   
> > > > > -lshell32
> > > > >   check_lib wincrypt "windows.h wincrypt.h" CryptGenRandom       
> > > > > -ladvapi32
> > > > >   check_lib psapi    "windows.h psapi.h"    GetProcessMemoryInfo 
> > > > > -lpsapi
> > > > > +check_cpp_condition Vista+ windows.h "_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0600" && 
> > > > > check_lib bcrypt "windows.h bcrypt.h" BCryptGenRandom  -lbcrypt
> > > > Do you really need to check the Vista condition? What about using bcrypt
> > > > unconditionally if available?
> > > 
> > > Yes, you need to use it only on builds that won't run on XP. Otherwise it
> > > will fail to load the bcrypt.dll and the whole libavutil DLL (or whatever
> > > its form) will fail to load. It would be possible to do it dynamically but
> > > IMO it's overkill. It's not really a critical component.
> > 
> > Is bcrypt available on XP? If no then the CPP condition check would seem
> > unnecessary. You could just check for bcrypt and bcrypt being available
> > would imply Vista. I think I'm missing something.
> > 
> > > But with time if XP support is dropped this check can go and wincrypt
> > > dropped entirely.
> > 
> > Is it maybe time to consider dropping XP support?
> 
> I wouldn't mind.

Let's go ahead then.

> See e.g. 9b121dfc32810250938021952aab4172a988cb56 in ffmpeg; dropping XP
> support simplifies the w32pthreads wrapper and allows using better
> synchronization primitives, that allow e.g. static initialization of
> mutexes.

Do we need to do more changes apart from importing that commit?

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to