On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Bruce Wheaton <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Oct 13, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Sean McAllister wrote:
>
>  On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Bruce Wheaton <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  I'm getting packets back and decoding them just fine, but I'm confused
>>> now
>>> - aren't the time stamps in timescale units? The movie I'm testing now
>>> has a
>>> timescale of 2997, but the packets are coming in as 0, 1, 2, 3, not 0,
>>> 100,
>>> 200 etc.
>>>
>>> Is there another timescale I need to look at to decode packet times?
>>>
>>> I can't really tell if it varies, or I'm just lucky that some movies do
>>> have a timescale that makes sense, because some are playing.
>>>
>>>
>> I know I ran into problems confusing the two time_stamp values that are
>> present
>>
>> There's:
>> p_format_ctx_->streams[video_stream_]->codec->time_base
>> and then:
>> p_format_ctx_->streams[video_stream_]->time_base
>>
>> The latter is what I use to convert my PTS values, and it seems to work
>> fine.
>>
>
>
> Sounds like a good thing to look at. I'm using:
>
> ffmpeg::AVRational time_base    =
> pFormatCtx->streams[videoStream]->time_base;
>
> movieTimeScale                  = time_base.den;
>
> So that's the same as yours, as far as I can tell. But the packet PTS is in
> frame numbers. Maybe the other way around?
>
>
> Bruce
>
>
Perhaps, it looked like my time_base in the codec was 1/(2*Framerate) (about
.0166 for 29.97fps), so if you're getting frame numbers out, that might be
the one you want...
_______________________________________________
libav-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user

Reply via email to