Yeah, I tried changing bitrate, but i've seen no apparent change.

Marcelo, o Caniato!

"Faça da tua vida um reflexo da sociedade que desejas."
(Mahatma Ghandi)


2009/11/23 Glen Ruedinger <[email protected]>

> Bitrate is the most obvious that comes to mind as it control how much
> information can be encoded.  The lower the bitrate the less data that is
> encoded.  But with lower bitrate comes worse quality.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Marcelo Caniato Renhe <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Glen, I'll check it.
> >
> > Plus, I forgot to mention that I tested the streaming through localhost,
> > then through different PCs in the same LAN, then through Internet. This
> > influenced in the result too. The results for Internet, as expected, was
> > worse, but they were TOO worse. I am sending a 640x240 buffer (two
> 340x240
> > buffers concatenated side by side). Are there any codec parameters that
> may
> > be helpful for my streaming purposes?
> >
> > Marcelo, o Caniato!
> >
> > "Faça da tua vida um reflexo da sociedade que desejas."
> > (Mahatma Ghandi)
> >
> >
> > 2009/11/23 Glen Ruedinger <[email protected]>
> >
> > > You might want to check CPU load during compression.  H264 requires a
> lot
> > > of
> > > CPU for encoding especially frames with lots of motion.  It may be that
> > the
> > > CPU is not keeping up with the input source.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Marcelo Caniato Renhe <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello all!
> > > >
> > > > I am developing an application which encodes video frames captured
> from
> > a
> > > > webcam and sends the frames through UDP streaming to a client
> connected
> > > to
> > > > it. The client then decodes the frame and exhibits it on the screen.
> I
> > am
> > > > using H.264 codec and I am getting a lot of noise. At first, I
> thought
> > it
> > > > could be just because of packet loss, but I have an alternate JPEG
> > > encoding
> > > > which is working better than H.264. So packet loss doesn't make
> sense,
> > > > because the size of the buffer sent is a lot smaller in H.264 than in
> > > JPEG
> > > > (approximately 4x smaller). I tried to play with the codec
> parameters,
> > > but
> > > > they are so many and the documentation is not much helpful.
> > > >
> > > > So if any of you know how to reduce the noise in the image or have
> some
> > > > tips
> > > > for me, please answer. Basically, when I move the camera, a lot of
> > > glitches
> > > > appear in the screen and some portions of previous frames keep kind
> of
> > > > repeating in the new frames. It stabilizes, but it takes some time,
> and
> > I
> > > > need it to be real time.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you!
> > > >
> > > > Marcelo, o Caniato!
> > > >
> > > > "Faça da tua vida um reflexo da sociedade que desejas."
> > > > (Mahatma Ghandi)
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > libav-user mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > libav-user mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > libav-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
> >
> _______________________________________________
> libav-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
>
_______________________________________________
libav-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user

Reply via email to