In theory you could be sending from another thread to stdout or pipe and ffmpeg would then consume that. There's lots of "magic" in ffmpeg and sometimes it changes... Some codecs (libx264) also require semi-magical settings, perhaps in your case also.
2010/1/20 Torsten Wilhelm <[email protected]>: > That doesn't sound good, because I receive frame by frame from an > application, need to encode each frame separately and send the encoded frame > to another app. With the solution suggested by you, I could only pass and > recode a complete video, right? > > > 2010/1/20 Janez Zemva <[email protected]> > >> Haha, it's the age-old problem with ffmpeg, the quickest solution is >> to port the ffmpeg utility entirely, rename it's main function to, say >> main_, then call it just as you would from the command line. >> _______________________________________________ >> libav-user mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user >> > > > > -- > -- > Wir sollten besorgt sein, das Pferd nicht zu verdrießen und seine natürliche > Anmut zu erhalten. > Sie gleicht dem Blütenduft der Früchte, der niemals wiederkehrt, wenn er > einmal verflogen ist. > Antoine de Pluvinel > _______________________________________________ > libav-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user > _______________________________________________ libav-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
