Well as is not unusual a bug report comes in just before the weekend before a release. (Fortunately it came *before* though rather than after.)
I'll try to check things out on my own as well, but does anyone have an comments on using: "head -n 196 config.h" versus "head -196 config.h"? (And yes, using "head" at all here is a horrible hack that I don't know how to fix better.) See: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=13073 What's odd is that I use coreutils-5.2.1 same as the person in the bug report and don't recall such a message. But also I'm interested in other non-GNU head's and whether they support either of the option forms above. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Libcdio-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libcdio-devel
