Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò writes: > Hi, > As I"m still writing the eject drop-in replacement, I'm thinking if I should > replace also the 'volname' command which is provided by current eject > package. > Still I don't think it's something for unieject as that's an "Eject" > package, > and volname seems something more useful if it was added on libcdio itself.
I'd like to believe libcdio is trying to make it easier more portable in writing CD-ROM applications. So unless there is widespread dissent on this mailing list (but generally things are a bit quiet if not down-right apathetic) I'm in favor of adding into libcdio. > If this is the case, I can try to code a volname replacement using > libcdio/libiso9660 and then change Gentoo's portage to use that volname as > default (or at least try to see if it's ok for other devs, too, this is just > my opinion about this command). In addition to the above libcdio statement/goal, I like to believe the libcdio project also welcomes, fosters and solicit opinions and comments. (Well, actually many of them have been negative, perhaps because the API is bit bloated; but that's okay too. And if someone wants to unbloat it, that too is much welcomed and appreciated!) In sum, I think unless there are vehement objects (again see comment above on verbosity/apathy), it will happen pretty much as you want it to happen. _______________________________________________ Libcdio-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libcdio-devel
