My bad. In short, I've just committed changes to fix this. When I first started this and created the test ISO, I thought I'd use a file that was otherwise around in libcdio, unchanging, and for which there would be no ambiguity of whether it was proprietary or not. I hadn't imagined that COPYING in fact is not unchanging. I think the address in fact changed more than once.
For people who build from tarballs it never was a problem because they get the version that I have on my disk at home and I've arranged it not to use a symlinked copy that autotools will put in by default. So only has been a problem for those people who compile from CVS and use a newer version of autotools. This problem has been around for a while, maybe 6 months to a year. So the surprising thing is not that it's broken but no one (other than me) noticed it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi again, > > while playing with regression tests: > > ../check_iso.sh: iso-info basic test ok. > --- copying 2006-06-02 22:04:59.000000000 +0000 > +++ ./../COPYING 2005-04-14 05:08:53.000000000 +0000 > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > Version 2, June 1991 > > Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > - 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA > + 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA > Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies > of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. > > @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ > > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License > along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software > - Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA > 02110-1301 USA > + Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 > USA > > > Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail. > ../check_iso.sh: iso-read basic test failed in comparing output. > ../check_iso.sh: failed command: > ../src/iso-read --image ./copying.iso --extract copying > FAIL: check_iso.sh > > Can it be that the regression tests fail, because a file in an ISO image > has the old FSF address? :)) > > Burkhard > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Libcdio-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libcdio-devel > _______________________________________________ Libcdio-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libcdio-devel
