On Dec 6, 2007 3:48 AM, Markus Hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Mike Rylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > PS: yes, I'd be willing to bribe someone for this. ;) > > Fine. My account number is...
Heh ... I was thinking more along the lines of a beer or three if we end up if the same place at the same time, but whatever it takes! > > No, seriously, I read from your and Kjell's replies that it would > apparently make sense to reverse the default of this switch in future > releases. The drivers would be linked by default, and if anyone ever > runs into problems on some weird platform she could disable linking > with a --disable-libdbi switch. Would that help? > That would help the Evergreen community tremendously. And a new version always spurs distros to build and publish official packages for smaller projects like libdbi[-drivers]. I would offer to do the work, but I know nothing of autotools and its ways. I can't thank you enough, Markus. There are definitely beers (or a sufficient replacement) somewhere with your name on them if ever we meet. --miker ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Libdbi-drivers-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-drivers-devel
