Hi all, I've received a request to support in-memory databases in the SQLite3 driver. While this is fairly easy to implement, it would be a sqlite3-specific feature. I've seen that recent MySQL versions provide in-memory *tables* which cannot easily be supported by libdbi, unless we provide libdbi functions for creating tables. The PostgreSQL folks claim that their databases reside in memory anyway, if the available RAM permits and if the server is configured appropriately. How do other database engines handle this? Is it worth pondering a libdbi interface to in-memory databases?
regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [email protected] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Libdbi-drivers-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-drivers-devel
