Thanks for the interesting discussion, but its gone far afield from the original question.
Does cryptoheaven seem like a reasonable tool to depend on for journalists or businesses requiring security for their communications? Is it notably better or worse than gmail if you are not concerned about the us or it's allies as part of your threat model? My impression is that it may not be hugely different than a reliable ssl system.(I am well aware there are huge security.holes in such a phrase.) >From what I understand cryptoheaven has encryption done on user side but claims not to access this information when encrypted on its servers and does not store unencrypted emails on the users device. However a nonsecure user (one not using cryptoheaven) can access an.encrypted message by answering a question, so some access is clearly possible from the service providers side. Thanks again Brian On 9 Oct 2012 22:54, "Jacob Appelbaum" <[email protected]> wrote:
-- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
