Eugen, Of course you're right, and I've made that specific argument about closed-source crypto many times before. But it's still interesting since we're trying to glean as much information as possible from that report here, which is a first for Skype.
NK On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:08:42PM -0400, Nadim Kobeissi wrote: > > Regarding SSL, hasn't Skype claimed in the past that the conversations > are > > encrypted client-to-client, as in, even from Microsoft or Skype itself? > > Why is it relevant what they claimed? You can't check it, so why > spend any time on guessing, while you could be running a system > where you would *know for sure*. > > > If I'm right and my memory serves well, then it's striking that they only > > mentioned SSL in this report. > -- > Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by > emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech >
-- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
