-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/12/2013 03:17 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> That comes from a user's obvious lack of understanding about why a > user might want privacy/anonymity, which comes from a failure on > the part of the security community to adequately explain the > negative effects of ignoring the problem. ... <more really helpful stuff deleted> Thank you. This is some of what I was looking for in an answer. - -- The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS] Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/ PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1 WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/ "Injected with a poison! We don't need that anymore..." --Praga Khan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlG53esACgkQO9j/K4B7F8FimACg79tw9teAAjFjnxGLByLFgDjh /twAn3eJn0NTUGBtS78wTP64GDDd6geB =MyGe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
