On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:14:16PM +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote: > An interesting article, showing why ?responsible disclosure? of > exploitable bugs is a bad idea.
I concur. I've often argued that there is no such thing as "responsible disclosure" -- it's a self-serving fiction concocted to satisfy the PR needs of companies. [1] I'll also note that this fairly conclusively demontrates that all the blather about how the US government wants to promote "cybersecurity" is 100% bullshit. ---rsk [1] The same companies that have the arrogance to demand "responsible disclosure" from people who owe them *nothing* are very often the same companies who've failed to provide "responsible coding" to their own customers. *cough* Adobe Acrobat security hole-of-the-week *cough* -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
