On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 07/15/2013 11:45 PM, Catherine Roy wrote: >> >> As a member of the HTML working group and the Restricted Media community >> group, my experience is that discussions within these groups surrounding the >> EME draft have been extremely frustrating. The same scenario as with Jeff >> Jaffe's blog post has happened there. The whole thing has been rather unreal >> and this recent post[1] from a Restricted Media mailing list member sums up >> my feelings about how futile the whole exercice has been. >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-restrictedmedia/2013Jul/0190.html > > It seems like there are two fronts-- one, which you address by jettisoning > EME in freedomhtml, and another which is to keep member organizations from > standardizing software/hardware on EME. Is there any way for the current > members of all the working groups to put pressure on the WC3?
Is there any point to messaging the draft's editors directly? http://www.w3.org/TR/encrypted-media/ If you delivered a thousand copies of the Hollyweb petition a day, you could do it for nearly a month before running out of individual signers [2]. That'd be nearly 75k letters between all 3 drafters. 2: http://www.defectivebydesign.org/oscar-awarded-w3c-in-the-hollyweb -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
