Hi! I found one of existing documents on the topic:
http://openwaves.ws/ Mitar On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Mitar <mmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I hope you checked this list: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wireless_community_networks_by_region > > :-) > > There were already few times people were analyzing existing wireless > networks. I think you should get into the contact with those > researchers. (At least I know that I had to answer interview questions > few times already.) Currently, as far as I know, part of this current > EU project is to also analyze existing networks. I would recommend > that you get into the contact with them: > > http://confine-project.eu/ > > And of course with everybody involved in International Summit for > Community Wireless Networks. > > http://wirelesssummit.org/ > > I am involved with wlan slovenija, http://wlan-si.net/. > > > Mitar > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dan Auerbach <d...@eff.org> wrote: >> Hi libtech, >> >> We at EFF are writing up a taxonomy of existing "open wireless" >> commercial or non-commercial projects that have launched and would love >> input from folks on this list. So far we are looking at: >> >> Fon - http://corp.fon.com/ >> Comcast - >> http://corporate.comcast.com/news-information/news-feed/comcast-unveils-plans-for-millions-of-xfinity-wifi-hotspots-through-its-home-based-neighborhood-hotspot-initiative-2 >> Karma - https://yourkarma.com/ >> Ruckus - http://www.ruckuswireless.com/ >> KeyWifi - is this project still active? >> >> We're sure there are many more, and wanted to see if people here could >> help by pointing us towards launched projects to add to the list. It's >> hard to draw a bright line between what counts as a "launched project" >> vs, say, a technical solution. For example, we don't want to include a >> protocol like EAP-SIM or firmware that has optional open wireless as a >> launched project, but firmware that ships with "default on" guest >> networking might qualify. Any suggestions you have are great so don't >> hesitate to let us know about any cool thing related to open wireless, >> just please don't be offended if we decide not to categorize it as a >> launched project. >> >> Our goal is NOT to promote these solutions, but rather just to give an >> idea of what's out there, what desirable properties each offering has, >> and what properties it lacks. For example, we think decentralized >> solutions that have no captive portals or authentication and are >> universally available are preferred. We do not want to get into a >> discussion of the security properties of open wireless, or any >> discussion about the merits of one solution vs another -- we are simply >> seeking information on what is out there. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Dan Auerbach >> Staff Technologist >> Electronic Frontier Foundation >> d...@eff.org >> 415 436 9333 x134 >> >> -- >> Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by >> emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at >> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech > > > > -- > http://mitar.tnode.com/ > https://twitter.com/mitar_m -- http://mitar.tnode.com/ https://twitter.com/mitar_m -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
