To whom it may concern:

RATT(Rodents Against Traumatic Tools) and ADDL(Against Dog Defamation
League) hereby express serious concern regarding the insensitive nature of
the cryptocat interface. RATT members deserve encrypted chat much as
others, but the presence of Cat Facts leads to undue trauma and we lobby
you to reconsider fixing this bug. ADDL feels your distribution of cat
propaganda (facts) is damaging and demeaning to the image of canines and
other house pets and urges all members of libtech to boycott said
technology until it becomes more tolerant of other domestic animals and
house pets.

(Please add your organization below if you agree with our petition and
forward to your friends and loved ones to stop this specist software from
continuing)

Signed

Members of
RATT
ADDL
CAT(canine advocacy team)
MOUSE (Microorganisms Organizing Upward Solidarity for Everyone)
BIRD(Beyond Individual Rat Defamation)
S:POT (Solidarity:Pets Over Terrorists)
On Aug 8, 2013 3:42 AM, "Nadim Kobeissi" <na...@nadim.cc> wrote:

>
> On 2013-08-08, at 12:25 PM, Jillian C. York <jilliancy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear LibTech,
>
> I would like to express my concern that the CatFacts function of CryptoCat
> is not operating. This is a Very Important Function to ensure the physical,
> mental and spiritual health of cryptocat users and I am deeply, deeply
> concerned about its inoperability.
>
>
> Jillian,
> My sincerest excuses regarding this. Cryptocat claims full responsibility
> for this issue. There was indeed a bug that would limit the number of cat
> facts displayed per Cryptocat session to a maximum of 2 (two) cat facts.
> This has already been fixed and is awaiting release in the next version:
>
> https://github.com/cryptocat/cryptocat/commit/83af5be7bb575187a404bb56e11f14a1ba866d9f
>
> In the meantime, Cryptocat will be deploying a *Cat Care Package* in
> order to alleviate the shortage of cat media that Cryptocat users may be
> facing. The Cat Care Package may be accessed here:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAIGb1lfpBw
>
> We are currently in the process of writing a meow-dvisory to address the
> situation. It may take us a mew moments, but I am purr-sonally confident
> that we will do everything paw-ssible to prevent this situation from
> cat-apulting into something worse.
>
> Thanks very much for your patience and understanding.
>
> NK
>
>
> Perhaps some time at the upcoming hackathon should be spent improving this
> function.
>
> Thanks,
> Jillian
>
>
> --
> Note: I am slowly extricating myself from Gmail. Please change your
> address books to: jilliancy...@riseup.net or jill...@eff.org.
>
> US: +1-857-891-4244 | NL: +31-657086088
> site:  jilliancyork.com | twitter: @jilliancyork
>
> "We must not be afraid of dreaming the seemingly impossible if we want the
> seemingly impossible to become a reality" - Vaclav Havel
> --
> Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google. Too
> many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
> moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
>
>
> --
> Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google. Too
> many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing
> moderator at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
--
Liberationtech list is public and archives are searchable on Google. Too many 
emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator 
at compa...@stanford.edu or changing your settings at 
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

Reply via email to