Il 10/20/13 5:02 PM, anon14...@safe-mail.net ha scritto: > On 18.10.2013 20:20, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > >> Generally is not valuable to use only 1 email provider, because email is >> made up of many pieces: >> - Inbound flow >> - Outbound flow >> - Data storage >> >> That require a user to have at least 3 different providers by: >> - Splitting your communication flow >> - Stay on countries with (strong economy & strong privacy law) > I’m asking on the practical side of the plan. I mail Mr. A. Mr. Now, second > email is more likely to end up in Spam. And there are so many yuppies writing > about the glory of having a Spam filter. So most people think spam means bad > and that’s it. Having the email address in the addressbook might help. But > that leads to my second point: Mr. A, assuming he understands I’m the same > person from a second email, hits reply, creating an inboud flow to a mailbox > made for outbound trafic. Never found a way to fix that. To fix the scenario you described you can just add a third "flow" that we can call "Reply Inbound Flow" .
This would be the email flow where all the persons "replying to email you've written" will goes trough. Technically speaking you can just send outbound email with a custom "Reply-To:" header set that point-out to a different Inbound email address/domain/subdomain (es: yourn...@reply.yourdomain.tld) that goes trough a different MX/forwarder on a different ISPs/country pair. Nice idea, it would improve this protection schema and i'm going to try adding this to my own personal email! -- Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) HERMES - Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights http://logioshermes.org - http://globaleaks.org - http://tor2web.org -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
