We always send a warning before rejecting any message. So it must have been a glitch in the system.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Carolyn Santo <cysan...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote: > I like this idea. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. > Finding and sharing information is a good way to prevent corruption. > > Yosem, please don't delete my responses. I believe the rules state that a > member will be warned if they post something that is unacceptable. My long > response to comments on a past email never showed up even though I sent > them twice. I carefully edited them so that they were respectful in tone. > > > > On 2/5/2017 9:54 PM, ernesto ortiz wrote: > > Wow! we lost the opportunity to investigate Obama (specially in his last > days), or Clinton, or whoever in the Presidency; why not > investigatingPower.com, or PresidencyFiles.com or something like that? It > seems that these kind of nowadays fever has more to do with this current > Presidente than with a real interest for truth or decency or solidarity or > even the infosec... (I mean, it looks as a partisan or ideological matter). > > > > El 6/2/17 a las 5:39 a. m., Yosem Companys escribió: > > From: Michael Ravnitzky <mike...@verizon.net> > > Investigative Reporter Peter Lance has started a website called: > > http://www.InvestigatingTrump.com > > Michael Ravnitzky > mike...@verizon.net > > > > > > > > -- > Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations > of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/ > mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change > password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu. >
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
