An informed juror can not directly nullify legislation or decisions. But he/she can indirectly. If defendants keep getting off via mistrials, prosecutors will eventually stop prosecuting/enforcing those kinds of cases - the laws in effect, nullified.
But. Maybe you are right about SC decisions; I'm not sure. Give me an example of one you think could not be neutered in this way. ************ {American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote "not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions. There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and unjust lawsuits. See www.fija.org [Please adopt this as your own signature.] } _____ Juries don't get to nullify unconstitutional decisions of the Supreme Court. --- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Paul, > > > > What about jury nullification as a third option? > > > > -Mark > _____ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/