An informed juror can not directly nullify legislation or
decisions. But he/she can indirectly. If defendants keep getting
off via mistrials, prosecutors will eventually stop
prosecuting/enforcing those kinds of cases - the laws in effect,
nullified. 

 

But.

 

Maybe you are right about SC decisions; I'm not sure. Give me an
example of one you think could not be neutered in this way.

 



************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org 
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }




  _____  

 

Juries don't get to nullify unconstitutional decisions of the
Supreme
Court.



--- In Libertarian@yahoogroups.com, "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Paul,
> 
>  
> 
> What about jury nullification as a third option?
> 
>  
> 
> -Mark
> 



  _____  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian  
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to