Like all other laws, they will expand and abuse it. Remember that when you are 
serving time and find that they will never let you out because your marijuana 
use can be a threat to the public. The prison system does not rehabilitate 
anyone, they just make them worse. The judicial system does not protect the 
constitutional rights of individuals anymore, they sell justice to the highest 
bidder. I would not call that justice, I would call that an auction.
                                                            James

To: liberty-l...@yahoogroups.com
From: jon.rol...@constitution.org
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 06:34:14 -0500
Subject: [Libertarian] Wrong but instructive: United States v. Comstock


















 



  


    
      
      
      Did Justice Thomas and the lower courts get it right? I think they did.



United States v. Comstock (08-1224)

Decided: May 17th, 2010

Breyer for the 5-4 Court; Concurrences by Kennedy and Alito, Dissent by

Thomas, joined by Scalia.

Full Text: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1224.pdf



NECESSARY AND PROPER CLAUSE (Congress has authority to allow civil

commitment of mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond

the term of their sentence).



The Government initiated civil commitment proceedings against five federal

prisoners just before their scheduled release date.  The Government

claimed that each prisoner had engaged in sexually violent conduct in the

past, and suffered from a mental illness that made him sexually dangerous

to others. The prisoners moved to dismiss the proceeding on constitutional

grounds. The District Court found for respondents, the Court of Appeals

affirmed, and the Supreme Court now reverses and remands.



The Court stated five reasons for their holding: the Necessary and Proper

Clause grants Congress broad authority to enact legislation; Congress has

long been involved in the mental healthcare of federal prisoners and this

statute merely adds to a set of statutes that have existed for decades;

Congress has a custodial interest in protecting the public from the

dangers posed by such prisoners and this statute is reasonably adapted to

that interest; the statute aptly accommodates state interests; and the

scope is appropriately narrow because it applies only to a small number of

federal prisoners. [Summarized by: Amy Cook]



-- 



----------------------------------------------------------

Constitution Society               http://constitution.org

2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322              Austin, TX 78757

512/299-5001                   jon.rol...@constitution.org

----------------------------------------------------------






    
     

    
    






                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to