Afraid you've lost me old chap
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Valentine Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That must be because there is a religion > that is thousands of years old that already > holds these very beliefs. > > > Zack Bass wrote: > > > > > > --- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:LibertarianEnterprise%40yahoogroups.com>, Valentine Michael Smith > > <bkoehler8@> wrote: > > > > > > Somewhere I read of a law that says > > > something about making no law respecting nor > > > prohibiting the free exercise of religion. > > > If this law is still in effect, then if I create > > > a religion which permits what you prohibit > > > then you have violated that law. > > > > > > Prove me wrong. > > > > > > > That mess does not rise even to the level of wrong. > > > > >
