Good idea. And I approve of overturning Contracts that are sneaky; they might be to some extent Fraudulent. I have been positing here a clear Contract that Jane damn well knew what it meant.
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm going to read any contract you write very, very carefully. > -- > Ward Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "What I know [about the art of the sword] boils down to this: If you see a guy running at you with a sword, put two rounds in his chest to slow him down, then one into his brain to finish him off". Aaron Allston, _Sidhe Devil_ > > The two halves of the ruling Party are arguing over who gets to be the Top this time. Either wins, Top or Bottom, they both win by the situation. For us individuals, BOHICA. > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Zack Bass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, "Zack Bass" <zakbas@> > > wrote: > > > .... > > > Kevin is desirous of having a sex slave. He draws up a Contract > > > whereby Jane can have certain assurances but will be his Slave from > > > the minute she signs the Contract. The Contract specifies that John > > > will provide a certain amount of money in a Trust Fund > > > > Who the hell is John? Did someone leave the door open? I meant > > Kevin. Begone John! >
