At 06:38 AM 9/22/2009, you wrote: > > > >In my attempts to get an answer to the question, I wrote to a girl I >know well, who had praised Badnarik in public last time she >mentioned him. Now she comes up with the following. (She must have >thought I meant that he was going to run for Sheriff in Montana, not Texas.) >None of this is a negative in my book (note that he agrees with ME >on a Victim's Retaliation), but obviously the author of this letter >thought so - and she's a lot closer to the Granny types. >But I'll keep asking The Question; eventually we'll know The Answer.
Former girl-friend/lover? We know how unbiased those tend to be Zack.... ^^ I don't know the fellow personally, so I can't say yea or nay. But the below does sound like a typical response from one. >====================================================================== >====================================================================== >I wouldn't trust him, he isn't qualified. He just wants to carry a >gun, He is considered by many here in Austin to be a communist. He >is also an atheist. You do not want him in Montana. He really isn't >qualified to do anything like that. He has no clue what to do, and >his ego is huge. This is a very bad idea. >Badnarik is not sheriff material. He is a self absorbed egotist. >Trust me, I was very friendly with him for a while and he is stupid >as sludge, scared to death. Once he saw an EMT worker looking for an >address and he hid in the closet with his gun on. He thought people >were coming to get him. He is such a loser here in Texas that he >needs to go to Montana to be some hot shot. Sorry to sound so >negative, the man is considered by some of his long term 'friends' >to be a square. Plus... he is a very angry man... holds it all in. >What he told me was when his campaign manager took off a couple of >weeks before the campaign (for rep in Texas) he blamed him for his >loss, and told me that he wanted to kill him... the only thing that >kept him from killing him was he couldn't figure out what to do with >the body. He said he thought of this for months and would kill him >if he could of figured out how to hide the body so he wouldn't be >caught... I am not joking about this. People need to know this... I >do not think he is very stable either. He is not sheriff material. > >Good to hear from you. I hope you can influence this, it would be a >disaster. He is not what he portrays himself to be. >====================================================================== >====================================================================== > >--- In ><mailto:LibertarianEnterprise%40yahoogroups.com>LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, > >"zakbas" <zak...@...> wrote: > > > > > > <http://badnarikforsheriff.com/>http://badnarikforsheriff.com/ > > > > I have been told that Michael Badnarik will run for Sheriff in a > Texas County. I have one burning question about that: > > > > It is well established that it is perfectly legal in Texas, and > not even any kind of misfeasance or malfeasance or nonfeasance, for > a Sheriff to ignore a Texas State Law. One example is the > > Dildo Law. Most County Sheriffs simply ignore that Law with impunity. > > > > My question is this: if you are elected, will you refuse to > punish, arrest, or harass people enjoying their libertarian right > of public nudity? Or will you pander to the shitheads and Initiate Force > > against us? > > > > Please reply with your answer to: > > curi...@... > > > >
