On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:35:52PM -0700, Matt Tolton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't the #include <ev.h> in ev++.h be #include "ev.h" instead?
> If not, what am I missing?

Depending on the problem, you might indeed want "ev.h" there. You can
actually override how exactly ev.h is being included by providing the EV_H
macro.

-- 
                The choice of a       Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
      -----==-     _GNU_              http://www.deliantra.net
      ----==-- _       generation
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __      Marc Lehmann
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\

_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
libev@lists.schmorp.de
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev

Reply via email to