Marc Lehmann, el 22 de enero a las 12:40 me escribiste: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:25:52PM -0200, Leandro Lucarella <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, the compiler complained about changing the meaning of loop in the > > context of the watcher's base class, but adding the namespace to the type > > when declaring the loop variable did the trick. > > > > I'll commit this patch unless you have something against it: > > http://git.llucax.com.ar/?p=software/libev.git;a=commitdiff;h=a11114f6c6a06077bcd9e208c064ebed9e577f8c > > > > (I added operator () as an alias to run ()). > > Looks fine, but please do not use EV_THROW for the exception specification > (I changed thta in CVS already), but instead use plain throw (). > > The main drawback of using exceptions is using stdexcept, not specifying > what a function throws.
Well, I think you did a little more than what I expected. You made throwing bad_loop non-conditional. I think it make no sense to keep the conditional compilation just to set if std::runtime_error is used or not. The main point of the conditional compilation were to avoid the overhead of exceptions, not the overhead of an (standard) include. -- Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Se ha dicho tanto que las apariencias engañan Por supuesto que engañarán a quien sea tan vulgar como para creerlo _______________________________________________ libev mailing list libev@lists.schmorp.de http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
