On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:16:40PM -0400, Michal Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Do you thing it could be possible to avoid such conflict on upstream
> basis?
Unlikely, the "conflict" is by design.
> Giving example, to install event.h, ev.h and ev++.h to /usr/include/libev
> by default?
That would break applications that expect to find it as event.h (basically
all libevent applications).
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 01:06:27PM -0400, Michal Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ----- "Matt Tolton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not just leave out event.h? That's just for libevent
> > compatibility.
>
> Thanks, that was my original decision.
Why not do it like other distributions such as debian, where the common
header files are installed as alternatives, or optionally?
event.h is an alternative to the libevent event.h, it's not an unrelated
header file, it serves the same purpose in both libraries.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
libev@lists.schmorp.de
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
