On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Juan Pablo L <jpablolorenze...@gmail.com> wrote: > i m trying to avoid using start/stop or even ev_timer_again because the > socket is considered busy when taken by a thread and thread will hold the > socket for as long as clients have something to send which could be a lot of > info > or just a few bytes, i m trying to say that a thread may hold the socket > longer than the > idle time out so how can i manage > to prevent the event loop from disconnecting a socket that is being used > by another thread ?
Well, not knowing the rest of this design, my guess would be that when a thread takes control of a socket, it should remove it from the idle timer linked list, and when it's done it should re-add it at the end. _______________________________________________ libev mailing list libev@lists.schmorp.de http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
