On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 04:10:41PM +0400, Vladimir Afinello <vovan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I pass a group of watchers at a time (at least 5), so at this moment I'm in > a callback of a one of that watchers.
That is no problem - after you stop() a watcher the loop will not access it in any way anymore. > Should I wake the current thread loop to perform stop() on the other > watchers in a group? I am not sure what that means, but again, if the watchers are stopped, then the loop will no longer access them. > I thought, the loop isn't in a wait state at that time since the callback > is executed. The loop state is safely serialised to memory while a watcher callback is executed. Basically, when you are inside a callback, you are in the same state as code running outside the loop. -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ _______________________________________________ libev mailing list libev@lists.schmorp.de http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev