On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:21:34AM +0200, Richard Kojedzinszky 
<kri...@cflinux.hu> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, I will do some research on this strange design
> of kqueue in freebsd. And thats strange for me that netbsd has a
> correct implementation, as all are bsd, but could that code could be
> totally different?

Maybe it was chance that I didn't hit a bug in the netbsd version I tested
with, however, it is my personal (and very subjective) experience that a
lot of functionality in freebsd was written to support existing programs
only, without making a full implementation. while netbsd might use simpler
but more correct implementations and openbsd just returns ENOSYS on every
function call. Or so.

-- 
                The choice of a       Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
      -----==-     _GNU_              http://www.deliantra.net
      ----==-- _       generation
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __      Marc Lehmann
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /      schm...@schmorp.de
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\

_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
libev@lists.schmorp.de
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev

Reply via email to