On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:48:32AM -0700, Benjamin Mahler
<benjamin.mah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah sorry for not testing it earlier, applying this diff didn't fix the
> issue in our test suite. Looking at the diff more closely, it seems to only
> address one of the postfork cases in epoll_poll, whereas we seem to be
> tripping the other case, here:
>
> http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev_epoll.c?revision=1.69&view=markup#l206
Sorry, that was an oversight, both postfork = 1 lines should indeed be
postfork |= 2. This has been fixed in CVS.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
libev@lists.schmorp.de
http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/libev
