On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Yucong Sun <sunyuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nic, > > Thanks for the reply, can you be more specific? Consider follow scenario, > > support in time T, socket event A, B, C is ready, > > in time T+1, in A's event hander, I created a timer event X, I hope the > execution order will be > > B, C, X, > > so that in time T+2 i can have > > C, X, Y(created by B's event handler) .
Oh. If the only events that you have active are A, B, and C, then you can just use event_active() to make new events active. The first one that you make active (X) will happen after A, B, and C; the second will have happen after A, B, C, and X. hth, -- Nick *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.