On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Roman Puls <p...@x-fabric.com> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > excellent - it would be even greater to specify a callback procedure > receiving the struct event tokens (I currently write language bindings for > tcl, and it would be great to generate the textual representation myself)
Hm. This would probably be a matter of turning "event_base_foreach_event_()" into a public, supported API. My main obstacle for that is that I'm not sure entirely what the documentation should say about what functions the callback would be allowed to invoke. Still, that's not insurmountable if somebody's interested in writing a patch (targetting 2.1, of course) -- 2.0 doesn't have event_base_foreach_event_() internally. > But why I write: > > shouldn't that stuff (event_base_dump_events) be mutex-protected? It probably should! A patch would be welcome. -- Nick *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
