On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Michael Plante<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Should we still keep support for libusb 0.1 because libusb 1.0 is not >>> supported on Windows? > > Is there a plan for libusb-win32 to support the 1.0 architecture? Are there > any issues with the driver doing this, or is it just user-space > modifications? Given all the certificate talk, *if* it's ever going to > happen, it should be in the next year or so. > >>> 3. ... >>> We can roll out a last release which support libusb 0.1 >>> API and in future we will not support libusb 0.1 in new releases. If >>> people want to use libftdi with libusb 0.1, they can use that release. > > Simply abandoning 0.1 support bothers me, since FTDI continues to release > new chips, but (correct me if I'm wrong) development of a version of libusb > 1.0 supporting win32 doesn't seem to have seen any progress recently.
Please take note that libusb-win32 1.0 and libusb 1.0 are totally different, not even API compatible. So even libusb-win32 1.0 is finished, it is not compatible with libusb 1.0. And currently there is no porting work being done to port libusb 1.0 to Windows. -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
