On Friday, 24. September 2010 11:34:03 Uwe Bonnes wrote: > Thomas> I still have trouble reading the code because of the "k" > bitmask Thomas> wraparound magic. Maybe we find a better name for it, > like Thomas> "eeprom_size_limit"? > > It is used as a mask, either 0x7f on 46 type chips or 0xff for 56/66 type > chips, what about "eeprom_size_mask".
Ehr, yes, that's what I had in mind. Let's stick to eeprom_size_mask. I'll do the modification. > But I agree, sensible names are the A and O of good documentation, but > are hard to get by.. Exactly :) Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
