On Monday, 4. October 2010 18:11:18 Uwe Bonnes wrote: > Thomas> Now we can decide if we want prohibit direct access to the > Thomas> private parts (by moving the ftdi_eeprom struct to a separate > Thomas> header file). > > Thomas> Though this will make the transition from libftdi 0.x to 1.x > Thomas> harder than renaming just some eeprom variables. Opinions? > > My vote to prohibit direct access to the eeprom and also to struct > ftdi_context
Same vote here: http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=140 I guess we did everything right (or are on the way to do it right ;)) Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
