On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Uwe Bonnes <[email protected]> wrote: > I see a lot of constructs like > /usr/include/<libname>-x.y/<libname>/<include files> > on my system
Even then, the question may come back to what is the intention of libftdi-1.0? Is the intention to replace libftdi-0.1x, then it is probably a better idea to put it in the same location. Right now only one can exist in the same place (/usr or /usr/local) anyway -- they can not coexist under /usr. I suspect this is the original intention and then it is better to be compatible with libftdi-0.1x and put the header in the same place. Is the intention not to replace libftdi-0.1x but create a new library, in that case, it is better to rename the header file so that it can easily coexist with the old library. -- Xiaofan -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
