>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Jarosch <[email protected]> writes:
Thomas> On Monday, 5. September 2011 20:02:53 Uwe Bonnes wrote:
>> All H type behave the same until now. So no need to duplicate the
>> expected results, as this may introduce errors. The test should loop
>> through the same challanges with the different types.
Thomas> Done
>> Also my code uses the 120 MHz clock, as soon as possible (458 Baud).
>> This results in a more exact baudrate. This is different form the old
>> behaviour, that didn't know about the 120 MHz clock in the H parts.
Thomas> Yeah, it's funny how the 57600 baudrate jumps to 120 Mhz and all
Thomas> the others use the 48 Mhz clock again.
Sorry
> > Divisor = value & 0x3ff
> > Encoded Fractional bits = (index & 0x100)?4:0 + value >>12
> > clk = (index & 0x100)? 120 MHz: 48 MHz
should have read
Divisor = value & 0x3fff
Encoded Fractional bits = (index & 0x100)?4:0 + value >>14
clk = (index & 0x200)? 120 MHz: 48 MHz
Patches will follow.
Bye
--
Uwe Bonnes [email protected]
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
--
libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details.
To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
