On Monday, 11. June 2012 22:21:58 Thomas Jarosch wrote: > I propose the following changes for libftdi 1.x > ------------------------------------------------------------ > - libftdi-config -> libftdi-1.0-config > - ftdi.h -> /usr/include/ftdi-1.0.h > - libftdi.pc -> libftdi-1.0.pc (pkgconfig file). Also "libftdipp-1.0.pc" > - we can't do much about possible man page clashes. > You can't prefix them in doxygen, just redirect > the output to a non-default directory > - Rename "libftdi.spec" to "libftdi-1.0.spec" > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Now the big question: Should we also change the library name to > "libftdi-1.0"? IMHO it's a good idea since broken linker flags might > point to the previous libftdi 0.1 and result in very bogus error > messages.
So, any opinion on this, especially the last one? Reviewing it a week later, I actually prefer "libftdi1" over "libftdi-1.0" as it looks less like the library version number. Though that would clash with the debian package name. If we stick to "libftdi-1.0", the debian package name might look like "libftdi2-1.0". Let's see what Aurelien has to say. Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
