On 11/05/2014 10:28 PM, Forest Crossman wrote: > >>> - ((vendor == 0 && product == 0) && >>> + (!(vendor || product) && >>> (desc.idVendor == 0x403) && (desc.idProduct == 0x6001 || > >> I currently don't see the reason why this part of the code was changed? > > Oh, I really only changed that to stay consistent with the other change--it's > functionally equivalent.
alright, I've applied the patch as is. Thanks! Cheers, Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
