Hi Clive, On Friday, 7. November 2014 17:25:31 Clive Stubbings wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > If you had asked that 6months ago I could have been sure, but I think it > was probably an externel prom on a FT2232HL dev board. I've been back > through my notes at the time and was working with a couple of different > units. > > We are in the process of putting one on a design, so I'm expecting that to > come off the reel blank. But until the board comes back I won't be sure. > > If you are uncomfortable with the change, feel free to sit on it and I'll > harass you if/when I see it again. I have a patched version here. However > I seem to remember posting the comment in the expectation it wouldn't be > a one-off problem. > > I'd also observe there are a number of other ways you could expose this > field. But one way or the other it should be accessible from the library, > even if thats through some extended-function call.
please don't top post :) I'd prefer to skip the patch for this release since I'm not 100% sure about the implications it will have. So let's have a "safe" release first and then we'll look for a solution to your problem in the next release. IMHO that's what you also suggested. Cheers, Thomas -- libftdi - see http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi for details. To unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
