ok. I think that my idea is proof of concept. ["人", "本", "person", "book"] -> "体" ["人", "木", "person", "tree"] -> "休" ["木", "木", "tree", "tree"] -> "林"
radical dictionary[1] is usable things. but I feel that using db is overkill in this case. It's prototype works. And my concept is not concrete too. Thanx for reply. [1] http://kanjidict.com/demo/radicals.html 2010/7/28, Maciej Piechotka <[email protected]>: > On 28/07/10 22:08, san hoi wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I have one question. Is there tagging library in vala? >> I found java's [1]. It seem to use google collection library. >> >> Sorry my poor english. Thanx. >> >> [1] http://github.com/sanity/Athena >> _______________________________________________ >> libgee-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libgee-list > > Well. I'd say no and planned. > > In 0.7 there is going to be support for functional operators which could > be easily used to do something similar: > > list.filter((x) => {return x.is_dog ();}) > > However as such there is nothing like (in internals) in libgee and it > uses 'naive' approach. > > > On the other hand why do you need it? I guess that the use-case > scenarios can be divided between using sqlite/Berkley db, tracker etc. > > Regards > > _______________________________________________ libgee-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libgee-list
