On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:33:35AM +0000, Matthew Booth wrote: > On 12/14/2011 08:44 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >[These two patches are for discussion only] > > > >Allow FUSE support to be used directly through the API. > >This is the second commit. > > > >In order to make this usable from guestfish, we have to > >also bind the events API in guestfish. This is the first > >commit. > > There's not really enough information here to evaluate the proposed > changes. Can you give an example of what you're trying to do?
There's a very specific need for this in OpenStack. We want to be able to inject files and make other filesystem changes -- and there is already common code which assumes the guest filesystem is mounted somewhere. But also we want to call libguestfs APIs such as guestfs_tune2fs. Currently we can do the mounting bit by calling guestmount, and we can do the other libguestfs API calls, but we need to launch libguestfs twice to do this. Here is Padraig's current OpenStack patch: https://review.openstack.org/#change,1993 https://review.openstack.org/#change,1994 > In general, though, this feels wrong for a couple of reasons. > Firstly, a callback mechanism implemented with shell scripts is > simply hideous. Imagine trying to use that from another language. This is only for guestfish (which is a shell script tool). How would you want to capture events in guestfish? > Secondly, mounting filesystems is not the business of the guestfs > api, it's the business of FUSE. I have't actually checked the > libfuse API, but this seems like a function which makes much more > sense in that context. See above. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
