On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:19:21PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> As you've known, vhd-util and qemu-img both provide the capacity for >> resizing the original disk, > > .. although they only resize the container, not the contents which is > what virt-resize does. So these tools are not really comparable. Yes. > >> but why is virt-resize designed to involve >> two disks, not only original disk? Is there any concern? Is it >> possible that only one original disk is involved in virt-resize? > > I'm guessing this question is why virt-resize doesn't work on disk > images in-place. > > This I hope is answered in the FAQ here: > > > http://libguestfs.org/guestfs-faq.1.html#why-doesnt-virt-resize-work-on-the-disk-image-in-place It is really what i want, thanks. > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones > Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com > virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many > powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. > http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
-- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs